The EditorCheeka SDM Leads Drive to Remove Encroachments from Patiala Road
Guhla Cheeka, August 5:
In a significant move to ensure smoother traffic and public safety, Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) Captain Parmesh Singh led a campaign on Tuesday to clear illegal encroachments from the busy Patiala Road in Cheeka town. The campaign was initiated following multiple public complaints regarding roadside congestion and increasing accidents due to unauthorized stalls and extended vendor setups.
Public Complaints Spark Administrative Action
According to sources, the local administration had been receiving continuous grievances from residents highlighting the dangerous congestion caused by unauthorized stalls and vendors occupying road space. These encroachments not only restricted traffic flow but also reportedly led to frequent accidents—some even fatal.
In a previous effort to regulate the chaos, municipal authorities had drawn yellow lines along both sides of the road, referring to them as “Lakshman Rekhas”, indicating the boundary within which vendors must stay. However, many vendors blatantly crossed these boundaries, prompting the administration to act strictly.
SDM Present on the Spot Despite Slogans and Opposition
In a rare display of firm administrative resolve, SDM Captain Parmesh Singh was personally present during the encroachment removal. Even as the demolition work went on, a group of street vendors and local social activists gathered at the site and raised slogans against the district administration and the SDM. Interestingly, the SDM continued the drive despite the visible public anger.
This led to growing resentment among certain groups, particularly vendors and their sympathizers, who accused the administration of targeting the poor and ignoring the upcoming Raksha Bandhan festival, during which street sales are typically at their peak.
“This Is a Blow to the Poor,” Say Local Activists
Local social workers Hardeep Badsui and Deepak Sharma stood in solidarity with the affected vendors and vocally opposed the drive. Speaking to journalists, they claimed that:
“The administration is hitting the stomachs of poor street vendors in the name of clearing encroachments.”
They further added that while the government runs campaigns against drug abuse, such drives could ironically push the poor towards illegal activities like drug peddling or theft just to survive. According to them, pushing these vendors off the streets with no alternative could destabilize their families, especially ahead of festive seasons.
Both activists demanded that the state Chief Minister Nayab Saini immediately intervene and stop what they described as the “dictatorship of the administration.”
SDM Clarifies: Not Targeting All Vendors
In response to the backlash, SDM Captain Parmesh Singh clarified the administration’s stance in a media interaction. He stated:
“We are not targeting all vendors. Only those who have expanded their stalls with large tarpaulins and blatantly crossed the marked boundary lines are being penalized.”
He also revealed that prior notices had been issued to these vendors, giving them ample time to adjust their setups. However, many of them ignored the warnings, forcing the administration to proceed with the clearing.
When questioned about the potential business loss to vendors due to the upcoming Raksha Bandhan festival, the SDM responded firmly, reiterating the need to prioritize public safety over seasonal business gains.
Public Opinion: A Divided Response
Support for the Action:
- Many local residents, especially daily commuters and shop owners along the road, welcomed the drive.
- They claim that for the first time in months, traffic moved smoothly on Patiala Road.
- A few even thanked the administration for ensuring road safety and pedestrian convenience.
Opposition Voices:
- On the other hand, vendors who lost their stalls claimed they had no other means of livelihood.
- Some vendors broke down emotionally, expressing concern over how they would feed their families.
One vendor, visibly upset, said:
“I have three children to feed. This was my only source of income. I didn’t get any notice. How is this fair?”
Key Issues Raised During the Drive
1. Enforcement vs. Empathy
The administration seems focused on enforcing law and order, but critics argue that enforcement must come with empathy, especially when dealing with the underprivileged.
2. Timing of the Action
With the festival season approaching, critics feel the drive could have been postponed or alternatives offered.
3. Lack of Alternatives
There was no mention of designated vending zones or relocation plans, which could have softened the blow to those affected.
Looking Ahead: Balancing Order and Livelihood
The incident in Cheeka highlights a recurring challenge for urban towns across India: how to balance urban regulation with livelihood protection. While the need for road safety and organized urban spaces cannot be denied, equally important is the responsibility of the state to rehabilitate or offer alternatives to those displaced by such actions.
Whether this drive will lead to long-term order or further unrest depends on how the administration addresses the aftermath.
