The EditorMLA Devender Hans Furious Over SDM Guhla Cheeka ’s Changing Stand on Alleged Illegal Construction
Guhla-Cheeka – A major confrontation has erupted between the district administration and elected representatives over alleged illegal construction on Panchayat Samiti land in Guhla-Cheeka. The controversy intensified after the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM Guhla Cheeka) repeatedly changed his statements, triggering strong reactions from MLA Devender Hans, who accused the administration of collusion and corruption.
Administrative Assurance Fails to Translate Into Action
According to information, the SDM had assured the MLA that action would be taken against the construction by 2 PM. However, despite the deadline passing, construction activities reportedly continued unabated at the site. The situation worsened when vehicles used for construction were seen operating late at night, raising serious questions about transparency and legality.
Local residents and public representatives expressed surprise that even after clear assurances from senior officials, no visible enforcement action was taken.
Contradictory Statements Fuel Controversy
The dispute escalated further when the SDM’s statements appeared to change repeatedly. Initially, it was claimed that Panchayat officials had no knowledge of the construction. Later, the same construction was described as legal and in accordance with rules, creating confusion and suspicion.
These contradictory versions angered MLA Devender Hans, who reached the site to assess the situation personally. He openly questioned how a structure could be declared legal after earlier claims of ignorance by officials.
MLA Alleges Collusion and Corruption
Visibly upset, MLA Devender Hans accused the SDM of colluding with contractors and shielding illegal activities. He alleged that public land was being misused with administrative backing, calling it a betrayal of public trust.
In a symbolic protest highlighting alleged administrative inaction, the MLA handed over a toy rattle (jhunjhuna) to the SDM, describing it as a symbol of administrative helplessness and complicity. The dramatic gesture left those present stunned and quickly became the center of political discussion in the region.
Night-Time Construction Raises Red Flags
Local residents questioned how construction work could continue during night hours without public notice or visible permissions, if it was indeed legal. They argued that legitimate projects usually involve transparency, signage, and official approvals displayed on-site.
The secrecy surrounding the work has deepened suspicion and intensified demands for accountability.
Demand for Vigilance Probe Grows Louder
Following the incident, calls for a Vigilance inquiry and high-level investigation have grown stronger. Citizens and political observers believe that only an independent probe can uncover whether the construction violated Panchayat land rules or involved misuse of authority.
Several social organizations have also begun demanding strict action against those found guilty, regardless of rank or position.
Political and Administrative Tension Intensifies
The confrontation has triggered significant political and administrative unrest in Guhla-Cheeka. While elected representatives accuse officials of shielding illegal activities, the administration has yet to issue a clear and detailed clarification on the matter.
Observers say the episode reflects a broader struggle between accountability and administrative opacity, particularly when public land is involved.
Awaiting Administrative Response
As of now, the administration has not officially clarified whether the construction will be halted, demolished, or regularized. Public attention remains focused on what steps the district administration will take next and whether senior authorities will intervene.
Conclusion
The alleged illegal construction on Panchayat Samiti land has exposed deep fault lines between the administration and public representatives in Guhla-Cheeka. MLA Devender Hans’s sharp criticism and symbolic protest have brought the issue into the spotlight, intensifying demands for transparency, accountability, and decisive action.
Whether the matter leads to disciplinary action, a vigilance inquiry, or administrative reforms remains to be seen—but the controversy has undoubtedly shaken public confidence.
